SS0147 - Land south of Barretts Lane, Needham Market

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive)

Representation ID: 27

Received: 01/09/2017

Respondent: mr thomas fellowes

Representation:

THE FURTHER URBANISATION OF NEEDHAM WILL BE A DISASTER.THE TOWN INFRASTRUCTURE WILL NOT COPE.THE SITE ENCROACHES FURTHER ON BARKING AND IS TOO CLOSE TO THE SSI AT PARKWOOD(BARKING WOODS).MSDC DO NOT NEED TO USE MORE AGRICULTURAL LAND

Full text:

THE FURTHER URBANISATION OF NEEDHAM WILL BE A DISASTER.THE TOWN INFRASTRUCTURE WILL NOT COPE.THE SITE ENCROACHES FURTHER ON BARKING AND IS TOO CLOSE TO THE SSI AT PARKWOOD(BARKING WOODS).MSDC DO NOT NEED TO USE MORE AGRICULTURAL LAND

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive)

Representation ID: 2272

Received: 01/11/2017

Respondent: Mr. A. Breen

Representation:

Not in the draft as yet un-adopted Neighbourhood Plan. It adjoins the town's cemetery which may not have sufficient space for the expanded town's population. There are strong doubts that development in Needham will be matched with better facilities.

Full text:

Though there is only a draft Neighbourhood Plan for Needham Market than draft has been professionally prepared and has been well considered by the Town Council. This site is not in the draft plan. It adjoins the town's cemetery which would be surrounded by housing and unable to expand. The only access road is Barretts Lane the use of the site would increase traffic along Barretts Lane creating an additional potential hazard for children crossing into Crowley Park or going to and from the primary school to the roads adjoining Hurstlea Road. Even if all the sites included in the as yet un-adopted neighbourhood plan are used there are major concerns that Needham Market's facilities will not improve in line with the expansion of the town.

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive)

Representation ID: 5003

Received: 10/11/2017

Respondent: Barking Parish Council

Representation:

This site MAY cross over the boundary into Barking, but this is difficult to ascertain without the boundary line overlaid. If it does, this should be clear and the site should also appear on the 'Barking' Map page 199.

Full text:

This site MAY cross over the boundary into Barking, but this is difficult to ascertain without the boundary line overlaid. If it does, this should be clear and the site should also appear on the 'Barking' Map page 199.

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive)

Representation ID: 7487

Received: 10/11/2017

Respondent: Dr John Caesar

Representation:

The western parts of this site could be considered too far from the town facilities.

Full text:

The western parts of this site could be considered too far from the town facilities.

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive)

Representation ID: 9955

Received: 08/11/2017

Respondent: HHF (EA) Limited

Representation:

Site does not continue the established pattern of the town, merely extending randomly into the countryside where it does not relate well to the services or the town generally.

Full text:

See attached letter, comments form and map

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive)

Representation ID: 11286

Received: 10/11/2017

Respondent: Suffolk Wildlife Trust

Representation:

Sites SS0146 and SS0147 - these sites represent a block of land which is likely to contain species and/or habitats of nature conservation interest. Further assessment is therefore required to determine whether development in this location is likely to result in any adverse ecological impacts.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive)

Representation ID: 12698

Received: 10/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation:

part of the potential development area is at risk from flooding from the Orchardgate Watercourse. Please either edit the potential development area to exclude the area at flood risk or sequentially site development in this area, while ensuring that as part of the development natural flood management is included to reduce future flood risk.

Full text:

See attached for full rep