Eye

Showing comments 1 to 3 of 3

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17487

Received: 26/09/2019

Respondent: Eye Town Council

Representation:

ETC requests that a section 17.31 be added stating
‘The centre of Eye suffers from severe traffic congestion caused primarily by HGVs requiring to use both sides of the B 1117 when navigating the town in any direction. For any development to be considered sustainable traffic growth will be assessed against the level of current use and proposals identified in the Eye Traffic Plan – Policy 32 of the ENP or other relevant document)

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Attachments:

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18359

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Representation:

Policy needs to allocate land for expansion of the school

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Attachments:

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18472

Received: 27/09/2019

Respondent: Mr TW Baldwin

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation:

At present the SHELAA has not considered Site SS0548 in a robust manner, nor has the site been assessed in the context of the allocations put forward in the Neighbourhood Plan.

It is our strong contention that Eye should be afforded additional growth by Policy SP4 and that Site SS0548 should be identified as a new allocation to account for any additional growth which is not yet accounted for in the Neighbourhood Plan.

Full text:

Please see attached consultation response