LA058 - Land east of Aspall Road, Debenham

Showing comments 1 to 6 of 6

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17996

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation:

Risk of flooding from the River Deben.

Full text:

As stated on our previous response, part of potential development area is at risk from flooding from the River Deben. We are concerned that the Joint Local Plan proposes 87 residential dwellings on a site with flood risk constraints without any comments on how flood risk is to be avoided or mitigated.
You must ensure that the potential development area is either edited to exclude it from the area at flood risk or the policy clearly states that development is sequentially sited in this area, while ensuring that as part of the development natural flood management is included to reduce future flood risk.
Modelling has demonstrated that upstream attenuation of flood water could have significant flood risk benefits for the village; reducing both flood extents and depths as well as economic damages (e.g. by avoiding flood damage to property). Increasing the attenuation of runoff from all developments upstream of the village could offer significant opportunities for reducing flood risk within the village of Debenham.

Support

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18011

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Debenham Parish Council

Representation:

Strongly supports the preferred options that relate to Debenham
These options are in accordance with the adopted Debenham NP which were arrived at following expert analysis, wide public consultation and independent scrutiny by a Government appointed examiner.

Full text:

Strongly supports the preferred options that relate to Debenham
These options are in accordance with the adopted Debenham NP which were arrived at following expert analysis, wide public consultation and independent scrutiny by a Government appointed examiner.

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18315

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Representation:

Add: An archaeological assessment and measures for managing impacts on archaeological remains are provided.
In addition to the criteria set out in the Debenham Neighbourhood Plan, this site will require a transport assessment The site will require footway access and to ensure a safe route to schools. Provision of footway should be required in policy

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Attachments:

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19143

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary

Agent: Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd.

Representation:

Insert new text after ‘Joint Local Plan Policies’, as follows:
…..Joint Local Plan policies, ‘the Council’s Infrastructure Delivery Plan’, and Debenham Neighbourhood Plan (Policy DEB5).

Full text:

Please see attachments for full submission.

Attachments:

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19754

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey

Representation:

We object to the allocation of land east of Aspall Road (LA058) on the basis that the proposed allocation cannot deliver a sustainable form of development that supports a
strong, vibrant and healthy community with accessible services that reflect current and future needs (NPPF, 2019, Paragraph 8), in line with the social objectives of the NPPF. We would challenge this proposed allocation on the same grounds as the sites north of Ipswich
Road and south of Low Road, in relation to the level of infrastructure improvements that such development could contribute to. Furthermore, the site cannot be considered suitable for allocation due to its lack of deliverability.

Full text:

Please see attached consultation response

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19814

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey

Representation:

We object to the allocation of land east of Aspall Road (LA058) on the basis that the proposed allocation cannot deliver a sustainable form of development that supports a
strong, vibrant and healthy community with accessible services that reflect current and future needs (NPPF, 2019, Paragraph 8), in line with the social objectives of the NPPF. We would challenge this proposed allocation on the same grounds as the sites north of Ipswich
Road and south of Low Road, in relation to the level of infrastructure improvements that such development could contribute to. Furthermore, the site cannot be considered suitable for allocation due to its lack of deliverability.

Full text:

Please see attached consultation response