LA057 - Land north of Ipswich Road, Debenham

Showing comments 1 to 6 of 6

Support

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18010

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Debenham Parish Council

Representation:

Strongly supports the preferred options that relate to Debenham
These options are in accordance with the adopted Debenham NP which were arrived at following expert analysis, wide public consultation and independent scrutiny by a Government appointed examiner.

Full text:

Strongly supports the preferred options that relate to Debenham
These options are in accordance with the adopted Debenham NP which were arrived at following expert analysis, wide public consultation and independent scrutiny by a Government appointed examiner.

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18314

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Representation:

Add: An archaeological assessment and measures for managing impacts on archaeological remains are provided.
In addition to the criteria set out in the Debenham Neighbourhood Plan, this site will require a transport assessment The site will require footway access and to ensure a safe route to schools. Provision of footway should be required in policy.

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Attachments:

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18561

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Historic England

Representation:

sites have the potential to impact upon the setting of several nearby grade II listed building including the 20 Low Road, Cherry Tree Inn, Malting Farmhouse, and Cherry Tree Farmhouse. These two sites could also impact upon the southernmost tip of the Debenham Conservation Area. The presence of these heritage assets, the conservation area and their settings should be reflected in the Policy, and suggest the inclusion of a new criterion which makes reference to the any listed buildings which may be protected (listing them) as well as the conservation area , and a requirement that development should be designed to conserve and where appropriate enhance these listed buildings, the conservation area and their settings.

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19142

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary

Agent: Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd.

Representation:

Insert new text after ‘Joint Local Plan Policies’, as follows:
…..Joint Local Plan policies, ‘the Council’s Infrastructure Delivery Plan’, and Debenham Neighbourhood Plan (Policy DEB3).

Full text:

Please see attachments for full submission.

Attachments:

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19752

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey

Representation:

We object to the allocation of land north of Ipswich Road (LA057) on the basis that the proposed allocation cannot deliver a sustainable form of development that supports a
strong, vibrant and healthy community with accessible services that reflect current and future needs and support communities’ health, social and cultural well-being (NPPF, 2019, Paragraph 8), in line with the social objectives of the NPPF. We would challenge this
proposed allocation on the same grounds as the sites south of Low Road and east of Aspall Road, in relation to the level of infrastructure improvements that such development could contribute to.

Full text:

Please see attached consultation response

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19812

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey

Representation:

We object to the allocation of land north of Ipswich Road (LA057) on the basis that the proposed allocation cannot deliver a sustainable form of development that supports a
strong, vibrant and healthy community with accessible services that reflect current and future needs and support communities’ health, social and cultural well-being (NPPF, 2019, Paragraph 8), in line with the social objectives of the NPPF. We would challenge this
proposed allocation on the same grounds as the sites south of Low Road and east of Aspall Road, in relation to the level of infrastructure improvements that such development could contribute to.

Full text:

Please see attached consultation response