LA001 - Land east of Norwich Road, Barham

Showing comments 1 to 7 of 7

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17234

Received: 25/09/2019

Respondent: Adam Steele

Representation:

With reference to the allocation plans LA001, LA002 and LA003 I object in full. Whilst it is important to provide adequate housing for the local community, these plans are unsustainable for the two villages affected. Furthermore, with reference to Barham and Claydon Parish Council’s comments, local comments regarding the proposed developments and consultation responses, the current environment and transport infrastructure cannot cope with such an increase of traffic and people.
Small, localised development is seen as a positive motion. These three plans are detrimental to village life.

Full text:

With reference to the allocation plans LA001, LA002 and LA003 I object in full. Whilst it is important to provide adequate housing for the local community, these plans are unsustainable for the two villages affected. Furthermore, with reference to Barham and Claydon Parish Council’s comments, local comments regarding the proposed developments and consultation responses, the current environment and transport infrastructure cannot cope with such an increase of traffic and people.
Small, localised development is seen as a positive motion. These three plans are detrimental to village life.

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17349

Received: 26/09/2019

Respondent: Stephen Carr

Representation:

I objectobjects to all three development areas proposed for our village. See above for more details. I understand that the Parish has proposed an alternative development site.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission.

Attachments:

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17399

Received: 27/09/2019

Respondent: Mrs C E Carr

Representation:

I objectobjects to all three development areas proposed for our village. See above for more details. I understand that the Parish has proposed an alternative development
site.

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Attachments:

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18225

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Representation:

Site will require further archaeological work to ensure it is suitable for allocation.
Add: An archaeological assessment and measures for managing impacts on archaeological remains are provided.
Add: A flood risk assessment should be carried out to identify suitable mitigation and a deliverable strategy for the disposal of surface water. Where possible development should avoid proportions of the site with predicted or historic flooding.
Rights of Way within the site and within the vicinity of the site should be retained and enhanced.
Policy should require a transport assessment to determine existing and projected capacity and any mitigation required.
Explanatory text to this policy should explain that policy MP9, MP10 and MP18 of the SMWLP will apply to this site.

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Attachments:

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 18557

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Historic England

Representation:

Allocation of sites would result in substantial expansion of the settlement. Particular concerns over the potential impacts the on setting of nearby heritage assets. Concern allocation of these sites would erode the rural setting of the Church of St Mary and setting of Shrubland Hall RPAG which is already at risk. elevated position of the church and the open landscape enhances the prominence of the church and its role as a landmark. Lack of contextual information and apparent lack of evidence means the historic environment is vulnerable to inappropriate development. If, based on evidence, an allocation is possible, we would expect to see any issues raised in relation the historic environment addressed in the policies and supporting text in order that due consideration is given to the historic environment.

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19138

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Suffolk Constabulary

Agent: Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd.

Representation:

Insert a new paragraph (below healthcare provision) as follows:
VIII. Contributions, to the satisfaction of the LPA, towards police facilities provision.
Provision of additional Household Waste Recycling to become paragraph IX.
Provision of Footways to be provided within the development and linked with adjoining site
(LA002) to become paragraph X.
Provision of bus stops to become paragraph XI.

Full text:

Please see attachments for full submission.

Attachments:

Support

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19806

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Pigeon Investment Management

Agent: Turley

Representation:

Statement supports two draft mixed-use allocations (LA001 and LA002). Claydon (with part Barham) is classified within Mid Suffolk Ipswich Fringe. These settlements are a focus for development. Collectively, the Concept Plan includes provision for;
• A reserved site for Pre-School and 2 Form Entry Primary School;
• A site for new healthcare/community use;
• A variety of green infrastructure including landscaping, strategic landscaping, church grounds, public open space, meadow and potential allotments;
• Up to 595 new homes (including affordable, self-build and homes for older people);
• Additional parking area and extension to St Mary’s and St Peter’s Church grounds;
• A new redirected vehicular route and footpath within the site along Church Lane to provide a safe route to the Church of St Mary’s and St Peter’s;
• Public Right of Way improvements; and
• Package of highway improvements for the village.

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.