Holbrook

Showing comments 1 to 6 of 6

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17164

Received: 25/09/2019

Respondent: AONB Team

Representation:

This allocation proposes the delivery of 10 dwellings as infill development on the east side of Holbrook village. The Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB boundary is located 300m east of the site and within the Project Area to the Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB. The introductory text policy text fails to mention this and should be amended.

Full text:

This allocation proposes the delivery of 10 dwellings as infill development on the east side of Holbrook village. The Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB boundary is located 300m east of the site and within the Project Area to the Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB. The introductory text policy text fails to mention this and should be amended.

Comment

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17277

Received: 26/09/2019

Respondent: Rebecca Coffey

Representation:

I understand that permission has been granted for 7 dwellings on Ipswich Road, Holbrook.

As a resident of Ipswich Road we have no objection to these houses being built. We do however object to any further planned development on the field behind this piece of land. I understand that the initial plans for these 7 houses show an access road for the field. This road can only be intended for future developments in the field behind.

I would very strongly urge you to reconsider this access and put a stop to any further development in the field behind.

Full text:

Please see attached consultation response

Attachments:

Support

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17818

Received: 29/09/2019

Respondent: Marek Pawlewski

Representation:

Given that Holbrook’s allocation for minimum housing requirement is 68 [Table 04], which includes outstanding dwellings with planning permission as at 1st April 2018, (a significant proportion of Admiral’s Quarter) [paragraph 09.04], and also taking account of the recent planning permission granted for approximately 10 dwellings (site LA068) and various other small infill sites, this shows that Babergh have taken account of the concerns of local people at the previous consultation event. The target of 68 has now been met and any further development will reflect the desires of the local community through the Neighbourhood plan. Well done Babergh.

Full text:

Given that Holbrook’s allocation for minimum housing requirement is 68 [Table 04], which includes outstanding dwellings with planning permission as at 1st April 2018, (a significant proportion of Admiral’s Quarter) [paragraph 09.04], and also taking account of the recent planning permission granted for approximately 10 dwellings (site LA068) and various other small infill sites, this shows that Babergh have taken account of the concerns of local people at the previous consultation event. The target of 68 has now been met and any further development will reflect the desires of the local community through the Neighbourhood plan. Well done Babergh.

Support

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 17822

Received: 29/09/2019

Respondent: Marek Pawlewski

Representation:

I would like to echo the concerns of the AONB team about the proximity of the Suffolk Coasts and Heaths AONB boundary to the proposed development site (LA068), and in fact to the whole of the village of Holbrook.

The other sites in the previous Draft Local Plan have been removed as they have been deemed as “unsuitable” by Babergh [paragraph 9.8]. This correctly reflects comments made by residents of Holbrook in the previous Draft Local Plan consultation. This shows that Babergh have taken account of local sentiment.

Full text:

I would like to echo the concerns of the AONB team about the proximity of the Suffolk Coasts and Heaths AONB boundary to the proposed development site (LA068), and in fact to the whole of the village of Holbrook.

The other sites in the previous Draft Local Plan have been removed as they have been deemed as “unsuitable” by Babergh [paragraph 9.8]. This correctly reflects comments made by residents of Holbrook in the previous Draft Local Plan consultation. This shows that Babergh have taken account of local sentiment.

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19506

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Mr G. Josselyn

Agent: Boyer Planning

Representation:

Holbrook is to provide 68 dwellings over the plan period. Concerned that a proportion of this figure includes outstanding planning permissions or applications pending consideration, and it does not plan sufficiently new growth over the plan period. We therefore do not consider that this level of provision represents the proactive approach which the Council have taken in other settlements, such as Stowupland and Elmswell, to allocate sites for the future growth of the District. In light of this, it is considered that land east of Ipswich Road, Holbrook represents an opportunity for sustainable development as part of the next stage of the Local Plan. It also represents a sensible and logical extension of the existing settlement boundary.

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Attachments:

Object

BMSDC Joint Local Plan Preferred Options (interactive)

Representation ID: 19522

Received: 30/09/2019

Respondent: Mr G. Josselyn

Agent: Boyer Planning

Representation:

It is considered that the site to the east of Ipswich Road would make a sensible and logical extension to the existing settlement boundary of Holbrook.

Full text:

Please see attachment for full submission.

Attachments: