AM64.
Object
Joint Local Plan Additional Modifications
Representation ID: 22461
Received: 27/04/2023
Respondent: Suffolk Preservation Society
Sound? Yes
This paragraph is unclear:
1) The wording in the following sentence is currently unclear: - Development of and improvements to services and facilities would include for example through expansion, upgrading and diversification with or without enabling development
2) It is unclear what constitutes 'enabling development'. 'Enabling development' is defined in para 15.33 as relating to designated heritage assets.
This paragraph is unclear:
1) The wording in the following sentence is currently unclear: - Development of and improvements to services and facilities would include for example through expansion, upgrading and diversification with or without enabling development
2) It is unclear what constitutes 'enabling development'. 'Enabling development' is defined in para 15.33 as relating to designated heritage assets.
This paragraph is unclear:
1) The wording in the following sentence is currently unclear: - Development of and improvements to services and facilities would include for example through expansion, upgrading and diversification with or without enabling development
2) It is unclear what constitutes 'enabling development'. 'Enabling development' is defined in para 15.33 as relating to designated heritage assets.
Object
Joint Local Plan Additional Modifications
Representation ID: 22517
Received: 27/04/2023
Respondent: Sproughton Parish Council
Sound? Not specified
The original text makes it clear that enabling development would only be considered in exceptional circumstance as a last resort. The modification text however suggests a consideration only on a planning balance. We would suggest the addition of text as follows ‘…conservation of a heritage asset, are in such exceptional circumstances and the only identified final resort such that this outweighs the disbenefits of departure from plan policies’
We would suggest the addition of text as follows ‘…conservation of a heritage asset, are in such exceptional circumstances and the only identified final resort such that this outweighs the disbenefits of departure from plan policies’
p130 15.33
The original text makes it clear that enabling development would only be considered in exceptional circumstance as a last resort. The modification text however suggests a consideration only on a planning balance. We would suggest the addition of text as follows ‘…conservation of a heritage asset, are in such exceptional circumstances and the only identified final resort such that this outweighs the disbenefits of departure from plan policies’