AM18.

Object

Representation ID: 22629

Received: 03/05/2023

Respondent: M Scott Properties Ltd

Sound? Yes

We are unclear of the need for the additional sentence about reviewing stalled applications, or the purpose of its inclusion. Part 1 of the Plan has identified all available sites for development and likely windfall. The additional sentence appears to suggest that an even greater number of homes could be delivered than has been identified, and that this may meet the housing need required under Part 2. This is not considered to be appropriate in Part 1 without evidence that this is likely to deliver and we recommend not accepting the additional text.

Object

Representation ID: 22887

Received: 03/05/2023

Respondent: Endurance Estates Strategic Land Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Sound? Not specified

para 06.04 - proposed modification states -
"In addition, the Councils are also addressing delivery through reviewing stalled planning permissions and investing in building new local houses."
This modification appears to undermine the Plan's new Table 3 (modification MM4) as it confirms that planning permissions (assumed "committed supply" in the context of Table 3) have stalled
AM18 confirms that the LPAs will seek to invest in new homes, which alludes to additional allocations being needed in the Part 2 Plan. These two matters run contrary to the position set out at Table 3 and add further weight to EESL's contention that Table 3 should be deleted from the Part 1 Plan.